JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 24, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Fabio Cifuentes

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Principios rectores
Accion De Tutela Contra Municipio En Materia De Confianza Legitima, Desalojo Y Restitucion De Predio De Uso Publico
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia para dar cumplimiento a sentencia T-527/11
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia para verificar el cumplimiento del fallo
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela E Incidente De Desacato
  • Diferencias
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de cumplimiento de la sentencia T-527/11.

La Sala de Revisión considera que es el juez de primera instancia quien debe verificar la existencia o no del incumplimiento de las órdenes impartidas por la Corporación y, en caso afirmativo, adoptar las medidas conducentes al efectivo cumplimiento de las mismas.

Se declara la IMPROCEDENCIA de la solicitud impetrada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Segunda de Revision de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Primero. DECLARAR IMPROCEDENTE, conforme a las consideraciones de esta providencia, la solicitud de cumplimiento elevada por el senor Fabio Cifuentes.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.